John Settle.jpg

John came to Shreveport in January of 1977 when he was transferred to Barksdale AFB.

He’s been active in Shreveport politics since deciding to make Shreveport his home.

John practiced law for 40 years and he now monitors local politics. He regularly attends Shreveport City Council and Caddo Parish Commission meetings.

John is published weekly in The Inquisitor, bi-monthly in The Forum News, and frequently in the Shreveport Times.

He enjoys addressing civic groups on local government issues and elections.

 

Update On United Daughters Of Confederacy Versus Caddo Parish Commission

On October 19, 7-5 majority of the Caddo Commission voted for the Parish Administrator to take appropriate action to have the Confederate Monument removed from the Caddo Parish court house grounds.

The Commission acknowledged that the Shreveport Chapter 237 of the United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC) owned the monument. The Parish and the UDC disagreed on the ownership of the land under the memorial.

The resolution did not set a deadline for removal. Nor did it authorize the expenditure of Parish funds for the removal or storage if the UDC failed to do the same.

After the Commission’s vote, a lawsuit was filed electronically by the United Daughters of the Confederacy in the United States Western District.

The UDC suit requested an injunction against the Parish for removal of the monument. It also requested that the court rule the UDC to be the private property owners of the land under the monument.

A hearing on the injunction will be held on December 11. Judge Robert James of Monroe will hear the case in Shreveport.

The UDC is represented by Dave Knadler of Mansfield. Parish attorneys Donna Frazier and Henry Bernstein represent the Parish.

The UDC’s pleadings assert that an injunction is needed until the ultimate resolution of the land ownership is judicially resolved. To be successful, the UDC must be able to show the likelihood of irreparable harm if the monument is removed before the final court decision. 

There is a possibility of damage to the 100 year old (plus) monument if it is removed.  And if damaged, the cost of repair is also unknown.

The Parish has an estimate of $278,650 to remove and store the monument. The estimate to reassemble the monument, if stored, is $298, 400. 

The Parish may have difficulty in proving any real harm for the monument to remain at the courthouse during the course of litigation. 

At the trial on the merits, the UDC will no doubt introduce the minutes of a Caddo Police Jury (the predecessor to the Parish Commission) that authorized the donation to the UDC of the land that is now under monument. However, the Police Jury never executed a deed to comply with the resolution. 

The trial on the merits of the case will not be set until after the December 11 hearing.

It is anticipated that the case will not be heard before June of next year. 

It can be expected that the losing party will appeal to the Fifth Court of Appeals in New Orleans. After that, relief can be requested from the United States Supreme Court. Unlike the right of an automatic appeal to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court decides which cases to hear.

Bottom line, no quick action can be expected on the removal of the monument. Perhaps the only good news is that no tax dollars will be spent by the Parish for outside legal counsel on this suit.

Feel free to share all or part of this column with others and to post to Facebook. No requirement to list my name. 

Shreveport Aquarium Under Water In Construction Debt

SHREVEPORT'S CRIME RATE AND MAYOR TYLER'S RESPONSIBILITY